Clarity Before Commitment provides structured coaching intended to improve the quality of a client’s thinking and decision-making in relation to arranged marriage and significant relationship decisions.
The relationship between Raj Mehta and the client is a coaching and decision-support relationship.
Its purpose is to help the client:
The intended outcome of Clarity Coaching is improved decision-making.
The outcome is not a particular match, engagement, marriage, reconciliation or relationship result.
Raj’s role is to provide perspective, structure, observations, questions, frameworks and practical guidance based upon the information available.
Raj may:
Guidance does not require Raj to remain neutral between every possible interpretation of a situation.
Raj may express a clear view based on the information presented.
However, such a view remains coaching guidance and does not become a factual certification about another person or a decision made on behalf of the client.
The client’s role is to provide reasonably accurate and relevant information, participate honestly in the coaching process, consider the guidance provided and make their own decisions.
The client remains responsible for:
A client is free to disagree with Raj’s assessment or choose a different course of action.
Payment for coaching does not transfer responsibility for the client’s decisions to Raj.
Clarity Coaching may be highly specific to the client’s individual circumstances.
Raj may discuss particular conversations, messages, behaviours, family circumstances, expectations, financial discussions, prospective matches or decision points shared by the client.
This does not mean that Raj independently knows all facts surrounding the situation.
Guidance is necessarily based upon:
If important information is incomplete, inaccurate, misunderstood or later changes, the assessment or guidance may also change.
A previous observation should therefore not be treated as permanently applicable where circumstances have materially changed.
A client may ask Raj:
Raj may answer those questions directly.
However, coaching is not a mechanism for transferring ownership of a marriage decision to Raj.
Statements such as:
do not mean that Raj accepted responsibility for the eventual outcome.
The client retains final authority over their life and decisions.
Raj has no control over the behaviour, representations, intentions or future actions of:
A recommendation about how to approach another person does not guarantee how that person will respond.
The level of access to Raj depends upon the specific service purchased.
Different services may include different combinations of:
Purchasing one service does not automatically include benefits belonging to another service.
Unless expressly included in the purchased service:
Any ongoing program or package will be governed by the scope communicated for that program.
Where follow-up communication is included in a purchased service, it is intended to support the coaching process and remains subject to reasonable limits.
Messages sent through WhatsApp, email, CRM, social media or another communication channel do not automatically create a new coaching session or expand the scope of the service.
Raj may request that a matter requiring substantial discussion be addressed through a booked session rather than through informal messaging.
Response times may vary and coaching communications should never be treated as an emergency-response service.
The relationship is professional but may be conversational, direct and personal in style.
Warmth, availability, familiarity or informal communication should not be interpreted as creating:
Raj may maintain reasonable professional boundaries even where a coaching relationship has continued for a significant period.
Either Raj or the client may decide that coaching should end.
A client may stop using the service at any time, subject to the applicable cancellation, package and refund terms.
Raj may decline to continue coaching where he reasonably believes that:
Ending coaching does not mean that either party has failed.
It means that the particular coaching relationship has reached its reasonable boundary.
Once the purchased service has been completed or the coaching relationship has ended, Raj has no continuing duty to monitor:
If circumstances change materially, the client may choose to book another appropriate service.
The purpose of Clarity Coaching is ultimately to make the client more capable of making their own decisions, not increasingly dependent upon Raj.
A successful coaching relationship should improve the client’s ability to:
The coaching relationship therefore exists to strengthen independent judgement rather than replace it.